U.S. Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Dearborn) wants to see more “accountability” for Mexico in the Trump administration’s proposed reboot of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
Speaking with Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo on Sunday, Dingell said she and her Democratic colleagues remain concerned about the lack of teeth in the proposed U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)’s labor enforcement provisions.
She pointed to General Motors building its rebooted Blazer sport utility vehicle in Mexico, where labor costs are substantially lower.
“We need to see Mexico do more to ensure there’s enforcement, that there’s accountability for the enforcement,” Dingell said.
“When we have that accountability, when we know they’re going to enforce it, then [this agreement] becomes okay,” Dingell continued. “The votes in the House are not there until these changes take place.”
U.S. Rep. Andy Levin (D-Bloomfield Twp.) expressed similar critiques in an interview last month with the Advance.
“It’s not ready for prime time,” Levin said. “The labor enforcement mechanisms are inadequate, and they’re not in the text. The environmental enforcement mechanisms are not adequate, and they’re not in the text.”
Both Levin and Dingell also voiced a concern common among Democrats that passage of the USMCA, as it currently stands, would be a giveaway to the prescription drug industry, raising costs for consumers.
The New York Times reports that the issue involves a certain group of drugs receiving what amounts to a decade of price protection against other products. Keeping that provision, they say, would undercut wider efforts to rein in health care costs.
Ultimately, Dingell said her objections to the USMCA’s current incarnation stem from the inability for workers and companies that deal with partners in Mexico and Canada to know that they’ll be held to the same high labor standards as their American counterparts.
“So I wish we had more certainty,” Dingell said, adding that she wants a vote as soon as possible, assuming the changes are made. “We need these tweaks [to the proposed agreement].”