WASHINGTON — The U.S. House on Thursday voted to formalize its impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.
Lawmakers adopted a resolution that lays out procedures for the inquiry that is already taking place in the House. That investigation is centered on whether the president abused his power by attempting to pressure the president of Ukraine to investigate Trump’s political opponent.
The measure passed largely along partisan lines by a vote of 232-196, with no Republicans backing the resolution.
As the Advance reported on Wednesday, all six Michigan Republican U.S. House members wrote a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) knocking the resolution and voted no as expected. They are: U.S. Reps. Jack Bergman of Watersmeet, Bill Huizenga of Zeeland, John Moolenaar of Midland, Fred Upton of St. Joseph, Tim Walberg of Tipton and Paul Mitchell of Dryden.
Bergman wrote on Twitter Wednesday that the resolution “attempts to bring a veneer of transparency to the proceedings, it falls far short and continues to undermine the bedrock principle of due process.”
The chamber’s lone independent, Justin Amash of Cascade Township, has been in favor of proceedings even before many Democrats and left the GOP over his stance. He sat on the Democratic side of the aisle — as he told the Advance in an interview last week he likes to choose his seat based on who he plans to anger that day — and voted in favor of the resolution.
“This president will be in power for only a short time, but excusing his misbehavior will forever tarnish your name,” Amash wrote on Twitter Thursday morning. “To my Republican colleagues: Step outside your media and social bubble. History will not look kindly on disingenuous, frivolous, and false defenses of this man.”
All seven Michigan Democrats have been on board with the inquiry for more than a month and voted accordingly.
“The President of the United States, by his own admission, used his office to try and pressure a foreign government into investigating a political opponent [Joe Biden],” said U.S. Rep. Dan Kildee (D-Flint). “In doing so, the President endangered our national security by withholding critical military assistance for his own personal gain. Over the last several weeks, senior White House officials, career foreign service officers and national security officials have all presented evidence of this President’s abuse of power.”
Kildee added that the U.S. House will “proceed with the seriousness that this moment in history demands.”
Two Democrats voted against the measure, U.S. Reps. Van Drew of New Jersey and Collin Peterson of Minnesota.
Many Democrats hailed the resolution as a roadmap that will provide for a fair and transparent process, while Republicans supportive of the president assailed the effort as a political attack.
“What is at stake in all of this is nothing less than our democracy,” Pelosi said ahead of the vote. “Sadly, this is not any cause for any glee or comfort. This is something that is very solemn.”
House Democratic leadership had previously announced a formal inquiry, but held a floor vote in part to combat complaints from Republicans that the full chamber hadn’t been allowed to vote. Still, Thursday’s vote is unlikely to reduce the partisan fighting over the process.
Trump wrote on Twitter Thursday morning, “The Impeachment Hoax is hurting our Stock Market. The Do Nothing Democrats don’t care!” He added later, “The Greatest Witch Hunt In American History!”
Trump’s critics in the U.S. House insist that the president’s behavior and their constitutional obligations have driven them to pursue their investigation.
“The House impeachment inquiry has discovered a substantial body of evidence that the president of the United States has violated the Constitution by placing his political interests above the interests of the country, thereby putting both our democracy and the nation’s security in jeopardy,” said U.S. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.). “In light of this evidence, the House of Representatives must fully investigate.”
Raskin said the impeachment inquiry guidelines are “fair and strong and make sure that we can and will defend the Constitution of the United States.”
U.S. Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Pa.) said on the House floor, “I take no joy in contemplating the impeachment of a president, because in contemplating it, we must acknowledge a threat to our constitution and the values that bind us, not only as members of Congress but as Americans.”
House lawmakers, Scanlon added, have tried to investigate allegations of Trump’s misconduct using “traditional means,” only to be “stonewalled” by the White House.
U.S. Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) said he didn’t come to Congress to pursue an impeachment process, but “the facts demand it.” He added, “What we decide today will say more about us than it says about the conduct of the president.”
U.S. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) said, “It’s time for the American people to see how the administration put our national security on the auction block in exchange for political favors.”
Another Florida Democrat, freshman U.S. Rep. Donna Shalala, served in the President Clinton administration during President Bill Clinton’s impeachment. “Supporting this continuing inquiry is not a decision that any of us makes lightly,” she said. “It’s with profound sadness and disappointment that we have to continue this investigation. The accusations the House is investigating go straight to the heart of our Constitution.”
Republican lawmakers continued to decry the process, drawing criticisms from Democrats that they’re making procedural arguments to avoid discussing the president’s behavior.
“No matter what is said by the other side today, this is a dark day and a cloud has fallen on this House,” said U.S. Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee.
“The resolution before us today is not about transparency, it’s about control. It’s not about fairness, it’s about winning,” he said.
U.S. Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) called the impeachment process “a total sham.” The resolution, “which seeks to legitimize it, misleads the American public.”
Some moderate Democrats who voted for the inquiry stressed that their support for the investigation does not indicate how they may ultimately vote on articles of impeachment.
House lawmakers could vote as soon as this year on articles of impeachment against the president. If approved, the articles would be the subject of a trial in the U.S. Senate, where the GOP-led chamber is unlikely to vote to convict the president.