SCOTUS to hear case Tuesday on whether it’s legal to fire LGBTQ people

Susan J. Demas

WASHINGTON — Can employers legally fire people simply because they’re gay, lesbian or transgender?

That is the question at the crux of a trio of cases that will come before the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday — the second day of its new term.

At the heart of Tuesday’s cases are Aimee Stephens of Michigan, a transgender woman, and two gay men, Gerald Bostock of Georgia and Donald Zarda of New York.

Woman fights for civil rights in first-ever transgender case before the Supreme Court 

Plaintiffs argue that federal laws that ban sex discrimination in the workplace encompass discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has filed a brief, along with 20 attorneys general, agreeing with this assessment.

Defendants — and allies, including the President Trump administration — argue that laws don’t apply to LGBTQ people. 

The law at issue — the Civil Rights Act of 1964 — bans discrimination on sex, race, and other characteristics, but does not specifically mention sexual orientation or gender identity. The Equality Act, which would amend the law to specifically name those characteristics passed the U.S. House in May, but is not expected to pass the Senate.

The cases have major implications for the country.

U.S. House passes LGBTQ rights bill over GOP opposition

Almost 5% of U.S. adults — more than 11 million people — identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, and many report workplace discrimination.

The high court legalized gay marriage in 2015, but more than half of states, including Michigan, don’t have statutes protecting LGBTQ people from workplace discrimination.

There’s been another push this term to expand Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act to include LGBTQ protections, backed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and lawmakers. However, GOP legislative leadership has repeatedly said they’re not interested in pro-LGBTQ legislation.

Whitmer, LGBTQ caucus make big push to win GOP support for Elliott-Larsen bill

Stephens, a former funeral director and embalmer at R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes in the Detroit area, was fired in 2013 after notifying her boss she intended to transition from male to female. She filed a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which filed a complaint against the funeral home in 2014.

Harris Funeral Homes argues that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act doesn’t protect people on the basis of gender identity, but a federal appellate court disagreed.

Bostock and Zarda, meanwhile, also contend that they were fired in violation of Title VII’s protections. Bostock, a social worker, lost his job after joining a gay softball league, and Zarda, a skydiving instructor, was fired after informing a customer of his sexual orientation. Zarda, who died in 2014, is represented by his sister and partner.

Nessel joins SCOTUS brief arguing for LGBTQ discrimination protections

One federal appeals court ruled that Zarda’s termination was tantamount to discrimination on the basis of sex and was therefore a violation of the Civil Rights Act. In Bostock’s case, another federal appeals court ruled that Title VII doesn’t apply to sexual orientation. 

The cases — Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC, Bostock v. Clayton County and Altitude Express v. Zarda — will shed important light on how the current court views LGBTQ rights. Eyes will be on Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who last year replaced Justice Anthony Kennedy, a pivotal swing vote on matters of social policy.

The high court is also slated to review controversial cases relating to immigration, health care, guns, abortion and other issues this term. Rulings aren’t expected until the spring or summer of next year and have the potential to influence the 2020 presidential elections.

Allison Stevens
Allison Stevens is an independent reporter, writer, editor, and consultant in the Washington, D.C., area. She is a correspondent for The Newsroom's Washington bureau.
Avatar
Susan J. Demas is an 18-year journalism veteran and one of the state’s foremost experts on Michigan politics, appearing on MSNBC, CNN, NPR and WKAR-TV’s “Off the Record.” In addition to serving as Editor-in-Chief, she is the Advance’s chief columnist, writing on women, LGBTQs, the state budget, the economy and more. Most recently, she served as Vice President of Farough & Associates, Michigan’s premier political communications firm. For almost five years, Susan was the Editor and Publisher of Inside Michigan Politics, the most-cited political newsletter in the state. Susan’s award-winning political analysis has run in more than 80 national, international and regional media outlets, including the Guardian U.K., NBC News, the New York Times, the Detroit News and MLive. She is the only Michigan journalist to be named to the Washington Post’s list of “Best Political Reporters,” the Huffington Post’s list of “Best Political Tweeters” and the Washington Post’s list of “Best Political Bloggers.” Susan was the recipient of a prestigious Knight Foundation fellowship in nonprofits and politics. She served as Deputy Editor for MIRS News and helped launch the Michigan Truth Squad, the Center for Michigan’s fact-checking project. She started her journalism career reporting on the Iowa caucuses for The (Cedar Rapids) Gazette. Susan has hiked over 3,000 solo miles across four continents and climbed more than 60 mountains. She also enjoys dragging her husband and two teenagers along, even if no one else wants to sleep in a tent anymore.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here